Hi Christophe,
On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 6:21 PM, Christophe Fergeau <cfergeau(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Hey,
On Tue, Nov 01, 2016 at 05:46:05PM +0100, Zeeshan Ali wrote:
> Currently we can and do get into serious trouble with this kind of code:
>
> devices = gvir_config_domain_get_devices(domain);
> gvir_config_domain_set_devices(domain, domain);
>
> since the first call above won't return a complete list of objects present
> in the domain but only the ones we have specific classes for and the
> second call above overwrites all device nodes under the domain. This
> lately made Boxes break against the latest libvirt, where a new device
> node was made compulsory[1].
>
> Although we should add support for all know domain devices ASAP, new
> devices will be added in future and this can happen again. So let's first
> ensure that gvir_config_domain_get_devices() always returns all devices
> under the domain. All unknown/unimplemented devices will now be returned
> as the very generic DomainDevice objects. Once we add support for a
> particular device, there will be no API/ABI breakage since the new class
> will inherit from DomainDevice class.
>
> [1]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1388091
> ---
> libvirt-gconfig/libvirt-gconfig-domain-device.c | 11 ++++-------
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/libvirt-gconfig/libvirt-gconfig-domain-device.c
b/libvirt-gconfig/libvirt-gconfig-domain-device.c
> index f78173a..3efca62 100644
> --- a/libvirt-gconfig/libvirt-gconfig-domain-device.c
> +++ b/libvirt-gconfig/libvirt-gconfig-domain-device.c
> @@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ gvir_config_domain_device_new_from_tree(GVirConfigXmlDoc *doc,
> } else if (xmlStrEqual(tree->name, (xmlChar*)"controller")) {
> return gvir_config_domain_controller_new_from_tree(doc, tree);
> } else if (xmlStrEqual(tree->name, (xmlChar*)"lease")) {
> - goto unimplemented;
> + type = GVIR_CONFIG_TYPE_DOMAIN_DEVICE;
> } else if (xmlStrEqual(tree->name, (xmlChar*)"hostdev")) {
> return gvir_config_domain_hostdev_new_from_tree(doc, tree);
> } else if (xmlStrEqual(tree->name, (xmlChar*)"redirdev")) {
> @@ -76,7 +76,7 @@ gvir_config_domain_device_new_from_tree(GVirConfigXmlDoc *doc,
> } else if (xmlStrEqual(tree->name, (xmlChar*)"input")) {
> type = GVIR_CONFIG_TYPE_DOMAIN_INPUT;
> } else if (xmlStrEqual(tree->name, (xmlChar*)"hub")) {
> - goto unimplemented;
> + type = GVIR_CONFIG_TYPE_DOMAIN_DEVICE;
> } else if (xmlStrEqual(tree->name, (xmlChar*)"graphics")) {
> return gvir_config_domain_graphics_new_from_tree(doc, tree);
> } else if (xmlStrEqual(tree->name, (xmlChar*)"video")) {
> @@ -90,22 +90,19 @@ gvir_config_domain_device_new_from_tree(GVirConfigXmlDoc *doc,
> } else if (xmlStrEqual(tree->name, (xmlChar*)"channel")) {
> type = GVIR_CONFIG_TYPE_DOMAIN_CHANNEL;
> } else if (xmlStrEqual(tree->name, (xmlChar*)"watchdog")) {
> - goto unimplemented;
> + type = GVIR_CONFIG_TYPE_DOMAIN_DEVICE;
> } else if (xmlStrEqual(tree->name, (xmlChar*)"sound")) {
> type = GVIR_CONFIG_TYPE_DOMAIN_SOUND;
> } else if (xmlStrEqual(tree->name, (xmlChar*)"memballoon")) {
> type = GVIR_CONFIG_TYPE_DOMAIN_MEMBALLOON;
> } else {
> g_debug("Unknown device node: %s", tree->name);
> - return NULL;
> + type = GVIR_CONFIG_TYPE_DOMAIN_DEVICE;
> }
>
> g_return_val_if_fail(g_type_is_a(type, GVIR_CONFIG_TYPE_DOMAIN_DEVICE), NULL);
>
> return GVIR_CONFIG_DOMAIN_DEVICE(gvir_config_object_new_from_tree(type, doc,
NULL, tree));
> -unimplemented:
> - g_debug("Parsing of '%s' device nodes is unimplemented",
tree->name);
Very minor, but I would have kept this g_debug().
Sure but I think it should be used for even unknown cases, not just
known unimplemented cases.
--
Regards,
Zeeshan Ali