11:15 a.m.
On 2015年03月31日 17:46, Martin Kletzander wrote:
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 10:23:47PM +0800, Huanle Han wrote:
Fix for such a case:
1. Domain A and B xml contain the same SRIOV net hostdev(<interface
type='hostdev' /> with same pci address).
2. virsh start A (Successfully, and configure the SRIOV net with
custom mac)
3. virsh start B (Fail because of the hostdev used by domain A or other
reason.)
In step 3, 'virHostdevNetConfigRestore' is called for the hostdev
which is still used by domain A. It makes the mac/vlan of the SRIOV net
change.
Makes perfect sense, thanks for finding that out.
Code Change in this fix:
1. As the pci used by other domain have been removed from
'pcidevs' in previous loop, we only restore the nic config for
the hostdev still in 'pcidevs'(used by this domain)
2. wrap a function 'virHostdevIsPCINetDevice', which detect whether the
hostdev is a pci net device or not.
3. update the comments to make it more clear
Signed-off-by: Huanle Han <hanxueluo(a)gmail.com> <hanxueluo(a)gmail.com>
---
src/util/virhostdev.c | 52
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/util/virhostdev.c b/src/util/virhostdev.c
index 83f567d..b04bae2 100644
--- a/src/util/virhostdev.c
+++ b/src/util/virhostdev.c
@@ -350,6 +350,14 @@ virHostdevNetDevice(virDomainHostdevDefPtr hostdev,
char **linkdev,
return ret;
}
+static int
+virHostdevIsPCINetDevice(virDomainHostdevDefPtr hostdev)
+{
+ return hostdev->mode == VIR_DOMAIN_HOSTDEV_MODE_SUBSYS &&
+ hostdev->source.subsys.type == VIR_DOMAIN_HOSTDEV_SUBSYS_TYPE_PCI
&&
+ hostdev->parent.type == VIR_DOMAIN_DEVICE_NET &&
+ hostdev->parent.data.net;
+}
static int
virHostdevNetConfigVirtPortProfile(const char *linkdev, int vf,
@@ -481,10 +489,7 @@ virHostdevNetConfigRestore(virDomainHostdevDefPtr
hostdev,
/* This is only needed for PCI devices that have been defined
* using <interface type='hostdev'>. For all others, it is a NOP.
*/
- if (hostdev->mode != VIR_DOMAIN_HOSTDEV_MODE_SUBSYS ||
- hostdev->source.subsys.type != VIR_DOMAIN_HOSTDEV_SUBSYS_TYPE_PCI
||
- hostdev->parent.type != VIR_DOMAIN_DEVICE_NET ||
- !hostdev->parent.data.net)
+ if (!virHostdevIsPCINetDevice(hostdev))
return 0;
isvf = virHostdevIsVirtualFunction(hostdev);
@@ -781,19 +786,20 @@ virHostdevReAttachPCIDevices(virHostdevManagerPtr
hostdev_mgr,
goto cleanup;
}
- /* Again 4 loops; mark all devices as inactive before reset
+ /* Here are 4 loops; mark all devices as inactive before reset
* them and reset all the devices before re-attach.
* Attach mac and port profile parameters to devices
*/
+
+ /* Loop 1: delete the copy of the dev from pcidevs if it's used by
+ * other domain. Or delete it from activePCIHostDevs if it had
+ * been used by this domain.
+ */
i = 0;
while (i < virPCIDeviceListCount(pcidevs)) {
virPCIDevicePtr dev = virPCIDeviceListGet(pcidevs, i);
virPCIDevicePtr activeDev = NULL;
- /* delete the copy of the dev from pcidevs if it's used by
- * other domain. Or delete it from activePCIHostDevs if it had
- * been used by this domain.
- */
activeDev = virPCIDeviceListFind(hostdev_mgr->activePCIHostdevs,
dev);
if (activeDev) {
const char *usedby_drvname;
@@ -814,14 +820,27 @@ virHostdevReAttachPCIDevices(virHostdevManagerPtr
hostdev_mgr,
* pcidevs, but has been removed from activePCIHostdevs.
*/
- /*
- * For SRIOV net host devices, unset mac and port profile before
- * reset and reattach device
+ /* Loop 2: before reset and reattach device,
+ * unset mac and port profile for SRIOV net host devices used by this
domain
*/
The comments were formatted as a sentence, it would be nice to keep it
that way.
Is comment as below OK?
/*
* Loop 2: For SRIOV net host devices used by this domain, unset mac
* and port profile before reset and reattach device
*/
- for (i = 0; i < nhostdevs; i++)
- virHostdevNetConfigRestore(hostdevs[i], hostdev_mgr->stateDir,
- oldStateDir);
+ for (i = 0; i < nhostdevs; i++) {
+ virDomainHostdevDefPtr hostdev = hostdevs[i];
+ if (virHostdevIsPCINetDevice(hostdev)) {
+ virDomainHostdevSubsysPCIPtr pcisrc =
&hostdev->source.subsys.u.pci;
+ virPCIDevicePtr dev = NULL;
+ dev = virPCIDeviceNew(pcisrc->addr.domain, pcisrc->addr.bus,
+ pcisrc->addr.slot,
pcisrc->addr.function);
+
The daemon will crash if this function returns NULL. There should be
check for that, but it shouldn't be fatal, so we can clean up as much
as possible (see Loop 3 for example on how to handle that).
Is this OK?
if (dev) {
if (virPCIDeviceListFind(pcidevs, dev)) {
virHostdevNetConfigRestore(hostdev,
hostdev_mgr->stateDir,
oldStateDir);
}
} else {
virErrorPtr err = virGetLastError();
VIR_ERROR(_("Failed to new PCI device: %s"),
err ? err->message : _("unknown error"));
virResetError(err);
}
virPCIDeviceFree(dev);
+ if (virPCIDeviceListFind(pcidevs, dev)) {
+ virHostdevNetConfigRestore(hostdev, hostdev_mgr->stateDir,
+ oldStateDir);
+ }
+ virPCIDeviceFree(dev);
+ }
+ }
+
+ /* Loop 3: reset pci device used by this domain */
for (i = 0; i < virPCIDeviceListCount(pcidevs); i++) {
virPCIDevicePtr dev = virPCIDeviceListGet(pcidevs, i);
@@ -834,6 +853,9 @@ virHostdevReAttachPCIDevices(virHostdevManagerPtr
hostdev_mgr,
}
}
+ /* Loop 4: reattach pci devices used by this domain
+ * and steal all the devices from pcidevs
+ */
while (virPCIDeviceListCount(pcidevs) > 0) {
virPCIDevicePtr dev = virPCIDeviceListStealIndex(pcidevs, 0);
virHostdevReattachPCIDevice(dev, hostdev_mgr);
--
1.9.1
Other than that, the patch looks fine.
Martin