Eric Blake wrote:
According to Jim Meyering on 2/19/2010 6:50 AM:
>> Why the change in .gnulib? Shouldn't that be an independent patch?
>
> Well spotted.
> I saw it too, and (as you probably noticed) removed it
> from the updated patch.
I still see it in your most recent post:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2010-February/msg00698.html
Humph ;-) Well I did remove it,
but then pulled it back in with an --amend.
Thanks!