On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 10:37:51AM +0000, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 05:21:23PM +0000, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> This patch changes the way we use linker scripts to have fully versioned
> symbols, and a versioned private section for symbols needed by libvirtd
> and virsh.
If you look at the version script below, you'll see that I've added
an explicit version section for each version in which we introduced
a symbol. Some people at Red Hat have suggested to me offlist that
this is overkil, and we could just have one section named 0.5.0
for all our existing symbols, and then just add new sections for
each subsequent release.
I kind of like the idea of representing all the releases in which
we added symbols, but functionally it doesn't matter which style
we pick for our existing symbols. Anyone else have an opinion ?
keeping the log may also help maintaining
http://libvirt.org/hvsupport.html
so I'm in favor of the full list
Daniel
--
Daniel Veillard | libxml Gnome XML XSLT toolkit
http://xmlsoft.org/
daniel(a)veillard.com | Rpmfind RPM search engine
http://rpmfind.net/
http://veillard.com/ | virtualization library
http://libvirt.org/