On 06/03/2023 15.06, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
On Mon, Mar 06, 2023 at 02:48:16PM +0100, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 06/03/2023 10.27, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 06, 2023 at 09:46:55AM +0100, Thomas Huth wrote:
>>> [...] If a 32-bit CPU guest
>>> +environment should be enforced, you can switch off the "long mode"
CPU
>>> +flag, e.g. with ``-cpu max,lm=off``.
>>
>> I had the idea to check this today and this is not quite sufficient,
> [...]
>> A further difference is that qemy-system-i686 does not appear to enable
>> the 'syscall' flag, but I've not figured out where that difference
is
>> coming from in the code.
>
> I think I just spotted this by accident in target/i386/cpu.c
> around line 637:
>
> #ifdef TARGET_X86_64
> #define TCG_EXT2_X86_64_FEATURES (CPUID_EXT2_SYSCALL | CPUID_EXT2_LM)
> #else
> #define TCG_EXT2_X86_64_FEATURES 0
> #endif
Hmm, so right now the difference between qemu-system-i386 and
qemu-system-x86_64 is based on compile time conditionals. So we
have the burden of building everything twice and also a burden
of testing everything twice.
If we eliminate qemu-system-i386 we get rid of our own burden,
but users/mgmt apps need to adapt to force qemu-system-x86_64
to present a 32-bit system.
What about if we had qemu-system-i386 be a hardlink to
qemu-system-x86_64, and then changed behaviour based off the
executed binary name ?
We could also simply provide a shell script that runs:
qemu-system-x86_64 -cpu qemu32 $*
... that'd sounds like the simplest solution to me.
Thomas