Re: [netcf-devel] [libvirt] [RFC] Reporting host interface status/statistics via netcf/libvirt, and listing active vs. inactive interfaces

On Fri, 2009-06-19 at 10:47 +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > IMHO that results in a bad structure, because its anot associating > the related info together, eg having an separate element to turn > on/off IPV6, and then listing addresses: > > <address family='ipv6'/> > <ip type='ipv6' address='2001:23::2' prefix='48'/> > <ip type='ipv6' address='fe:33:55::33' prefix='64'/> > > vs having the direct association > > <address family='ipv6'> > <ip address='2001:23::2' prefix='48'/> > <ip address='fe:33:55::33' prefix='64'/> > </address> > > the latter removes the redundancy from specifying address family in > multiple places Ok .. I agree that we should have a container tag like that - we should probably call it <protocol/> though instead of <address/> <protocol family='ipv6'> <ip .../> <route .../> ... other ipv6 specific settings ... </protocol>