On 16.09.2011 16:53, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 08:35:15AM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
>> On 09/16/2011 03:51 AM, Michal Privoznik wrote:
>>> If a domain has inactive XML we want to transfer it to destination
>>> when migrating with VIR_MIGRATE_PERSIST_DEST. In order to harm
>>> the migration protocol as least as possible, a optional cookie was
>>> chosen.
>>> ---
>>> diff to v2:
>>> -Fix substitution on wrong place
>>> src/qemu/qemu_migration.c | 81
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>>> 1 files changed, 76 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> Looks right to me, but I'd feel more comfortable with a second ACK
>> from danpb. I'm also hesitant on whether we should apply this now,
>> or wait to post-0.9.5. While it is fixing a design flaw, it is not
>> a regression fix, and feels more like a feature addition - if Dan
>> could run this through his TCK suite to ensure no migration
>> regressions, I'd feel a bit better about taking it now.
>
> I tend to agree. The code looks reasonable, but I think we should wait
> till post 0.9.5, to give more time for testing. In particular the
> interoperability beteen different versions of libvirt when doing the
> migration
>
> Daniel
Okay. Fair enough. Dan, if you'll have time and run it through your TCK,
that would be great.
I'll hold on pushing this untill 0.9.5 is released.
Michal
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
So I went ahead and pushed. Thanks.
Michal