On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 12:48:01PM +0000, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
Re-factor things a little for the next patch so that we maintain
the rules in memory even when we're not going to write them to
disk.
[...]
if (!(r = (char **)realloc(rules->rules, sizeof(char *) *
(rules->nrules+1))))
return ENOMEM;
Seems the rules tab is zeroed, but when you extend it you don't
zeroe the new part of the array, but it may not give problem in
practice (or a very hard one to track down ;-)
Daniel
--
Red Hat Virtualization group
http://redhat.com/virtualization/
Daniel Veillard | virtualization library
http://libvirt.org/
veillard(a)redhat.com | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit
http://xmlsoft.org/
http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine
http://rpmfind.net/