On 03/19/2013 08:13 PM, Olivia Yin wrote:
---
docs/schemas/domaincommon.rng | 2 +-
Your commit message is sparse. This is a good place to explain WHY a
maintainer should apply your patch.
On my Fedora 18 box, I see:
$ qemu-ppc64 -cpu help | grep e500
PowerPC e500_v10 PVR 80200010
PowerPC e500_v20 PVR 80200020
PowerPC e500v1 PVR 80200020
PowerPC e500v2_v10 PVR 80210010
PowerPC e500v2_v20 PVR 80210020
PowerPC e500v2_v21 PVR 80210021
PowerPC e500v2_v22 PVR 80210022
PowerPC e500v2 PVR 80210022
PowerPC e500 PVR 80210022
PowerPC e500v2_v30 PVR 80210030
PowerPC e500mc PVR 80230020
Doesn't that mean that both 'ppce500' AND 'ppce500v2' (and several
others) should all be valid machine names? If anything, we should
either relax the RNG grammar to allow freeform names (since the code
wasn't really checking), or we should enhance the grammar and C code to
call out the entire list of values that qemu supports. With as many ppc
variants as qemu seems to support, trying to maintain a list seems like
duplicated effort where we will constantly be behind. Therefore, I
think the best action is to do a mix: relax the grammar to allow any
string (the way we already do for x86), but then do a validation in the
C code that the string chosen by the user is supported by qemu (instead
of the current approach of not caring about the string).
I'm not yet convinced that this patch should be applied.
--
Eric Blake eblake redhat com +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library
http://libvirt.org