Re: [PATCH V2 1/9] spec: Move virtlockd to a new subpackage libvirt-daemon-lock
On Wed, Dec 14, 2022 at 09:50:47AM -0800, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
On Wed, Dec 14, 2022 at 09:31:31AM -0800, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 13, 2022 at 05:30:54PM -0700, Jim Fehlig wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Jim Fehlig <jfehlig(a)suse.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange(a)redhat.com>
> > ---
> > libvirt.spec.in | 61 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
> > 1 file changed, 44 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>
> Reviewed-by: Andrea Bolognani <abologna(a)redhat.com>
Actually, adding the libvirt-daemon-lock dependency to the sanlock
package should happen in this patch instead of in 5/9.
No we shouldn't, sanlock has no requirement for virlockd to be
present.
With regards,
Daniel
--
|: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|