Re: [libvirt] [PATCH] docs: correct setmem text plus expand setmaxmem text
On 01/19/2011 12:40 PM, Matthias Bolte wrote:
I wonder in which direction to go in order to unify this: being more
strict and do "value % 1024 == 0" checks all over the place, or being
less strict and just divide by 1024.
See also this bug report, where the request was made to round up to the
next integral block size rather than truncate or error out (regardless
of granularity of block size):
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670529
since storage management and volume creation is closely related to
memory sizes in that both suffer from block-sized granularity.
--
Eric Blake eblake(a)redhat.com +1-801-349-2682
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
Attachments:
- signature.asc (application/pgp-signature — 619 bytes)