Re: On the need to move to a merge request workflow

On Fri, Mar 06, 2020 at 11:44:07 +0000, Daniel Berrange wrote: [...] Many of the things outlined below can be also read as "if you spend some effort in using the proper tools and using proper approaches" you can be more effective than the web-tools which are better than the default approach but far from great. Arguably you could apply same logic on the web based workflow too, but we are in a gravity well of having stuff set up to our liking. I also presume the 'merge request' workflow still supports doing fast-forward merges only as that would be a very big regression since we've kept linear history until now. At any rate, I hope you are right, and in the end it will be worth the hit on the workflow of existing contributors and reviewers who prefer email.