On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 05:07:56PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 01:56:47PM +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote:
> Also, having the weak alias we can drop all the mocks and the problems
> with them and just redefine the functions we would like to mock in the
> tests (see tests/virfilewrapper.c), it would work on win32, it would
> not compile if we would forgot to make the function as an alias (so no
> need to check that in the syntax-check) and maybe provide other benefits
> that I can't think of right now.
Empirically I'm not seeing any compiler warnings if i take this approach
and don't mark the function as an alias.
Oooh, me too :( That's a pity; yet another thing that proves I still
don't _fully_ understand the details behind everything.