Re: [libvirt] [Xen-devel] Fixing libvirt's libxl driver breakage -- where to define LIBXL_API_VERSION?

Dario Faggioli writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] Fixing libvirt's libxl driver breakage -- where to define LIBXL_API_VERSION?"): > > And, in those cases, usage should be gated by the appropriate > LIBXL_HAVE_FOOBAR symbol, which I see in the sources (e.g., > for LIBXL_HAVE_NO_SUSPEND_RESUME or LIBXL_HAVE_DOMAIN_NODEAFFINITY) > to > be the case, so good again. :-) If libvirt specifies LIBXL_API_VERSION then it does not need to check any LIBXL_HAVE_*, since it will actually get an API corresponding to the specified API_VERSION.