On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 09:38:47AM +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
On Mon, 2018-07-23 at 09:27 +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> On Fri, 2018-07-20 at 11:33 +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 12:24:50PM +0200, Ján Tomko wrote:
> > > I do not oppose reverting this bit and failing by default if we don't
> > > have a JSON library (as Andrea mentioned, more drivers might possibly
> > > require a working JSON implementation).
> >
> > We use virjson.h throughout src/util and src/rpc so that code is
> > not even driver specific, however, there are not currently mingw
> > pacakges for jansson in Fedora at least. Maybe it will work, but
> > we would need someone todo the work to add that to Fedora before
> > we can consider making this mandatory.
>
> So does the MinGW build work at all without jansson, considering its
> functionality is fairly reduced in scope compared to the Unix builds?
Partially answering myself (morning coffee hasn't quite kicked in
just yet), the MinGW .spec doesn't list yajl as a BuildRequires,
which means that either we're not hitting any of the code paths you
mention on that platform, or we've been producing completely useless
Windows builds for a while now :)
The remote driver works fine without JSON being required.
Regards,
Daniel
--
|:
https://berrange.com -o-
https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|:
https://libvirt.org -o-
https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|:
https://entangle-photo.org -o-
https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|