Re: [libvirt] ANNOUNCE: Stable release libvirt-0.9.11.2

>> >> Is there any particular reason that the project is using the same naming >> convention for stable releases? It appears to be a minor revision update >> from the standard release cycle. From an outsiders prospective, I don't >> know how anyone would think that 0.9.11.2 is not a standard update from >> 0.9.11, as there is no distinction in either the name from the >> distributed >> file, or documentation (unless I missed it denoted specifically on >> libvirt.org). >> >> Would there be any objection to using a distribution file name >> libvirt-stable-0.9.11.2.tar.gz ? >> >> To me, it is confusing, but that is just my opinion. >> >> Thanks, >> Jason >> > > Don't change the tarball name like that. That would just plain suck > and be different than how 99% of projects out there do things. > Ok, but having the same download path is just as confusing, as it looks like an update to 0.9.11, when it is a different release.