On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 04:53 PM +0200, John Ferlan <jferlan(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On 07/03/2018 07:37 AM, Marc Hartmayer wrote:
> ...since maxWorkers=0 is only intended for virtlockd or virlogd which
> must not be multithreaded.
>
> Signed-off-by: Marc Hartmayer <mhartmay(a)linux.ibm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Boris Fiuczynski <fiuczy(a)linux.ibm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Bjoern Walk <bwalk(a)linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> src/util/virthreadpool.c | 8 ++++++++
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>
I think this is separable - this could be pushed regardless of the
outcome of patch2, right? Let me know - I can reduce the load the next
update based on patch2 comments.
Yep. Thanks for reviewing.
Reviewed-by: John Ferlan <jferlan(a)redhat.com>
John
--
Beste Grüße / Kind regards
Marc Hartmayer
IBM Deutschland Research & Development GmbH
Vorsitzende des Aufsichtsrats: Martina Koederitz
Geschäftsführung: Dirk Wittkopp
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Böblingen
Registergericht: Amtsgericht Stuttgart, HRB 243294