On Tue, 4 Apr 2023, Thomas Huth wrote:
On 05/02/2023 23.12, Mark Cave-Ayland wrote:
> On 30/01/2023 20:45, Alex Bennée wrote:
>
>> Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange(a)redhat.com> writes:
>>
>>> On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 11:47:02AM +0000, Peter Maydell wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 30 Jan 2023 at 11:44, Thomas Huth <thuth(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Testing 32-bit host OS support takes a lot of precious time during
the
>>>>> QEMU
>>>>> contiguous integration tests, and considering that many OS vendors
>>>>> stopped
>>>>> shipping 32-bit variants of their OS distributions and most hardware
>>>>> from
>>>>> the past >10 years is capable of 64-bit
>>>>
>>>> True for x86, not necessarily true for other architectures.
>>>> Are you proposing to deprecate x86 32-bit, or all 32-bit?
>>>> I'm not entirely sure about whether we're yet at a point where
>>>> I'd want to deprecate-and-drop 32-bit arm host support.
>>>
>>> Do we have a feeling on which aspects of 32-bit cause us the support
>>> burden ? The boring stuff like compiler errors from mismatched integer
>>> sizes is mostly quick & easy to detect simply through a cross compile.
>>>
>>> I vaguely recall someone mentioned problems with atomic ops in the past,
>>> or was it 128-bit ints, caused implications for the codebase ?
>>
>> Atomic operations on > TARGET_BIT_SIZE and cputlb when
>> TCG_OVERSIZED_GUEST is set. Also the core TCG code and a bunch of the
>> backends have TARGET_LONG_BITS > TCG_TARGET_REG_BITS ifdefs peppered
>> throughout.
>
> I am one of an admittedly small group of people still interested in using
> KVM-PR on ppc32 to boot MacOS, although there is some interest on using
> 64-bit KVM-PR to run super-fast MacOS on modern Talos hardware.
>
> From my perspective losing the ability to run 64-bit guests on 32-bit
> hardware with TCG wouldn't be an issue, as long as it were still possible
> to use qemu-system-ppc on 32-bit hardware using both TCG and KVM to help
> debug the remaining issues.
Hi Mark!
Just out of curiosity (since we briefly talked about 32-bit KVM on ppc in
today's QEMU/KVM call - in the context of whether qemu-system-ppc64 is a
proper superset of qemu-system-ppc when it comes to building a unified
qemu-system binary): What host machine are you using for running KVM-PR? And
Another issue I know is that mac99 behaves differently in qemu-system-ppc
and qemu-system-ppc64. This is not only confusing users but makes it more
difficult to get rid of qemu-system-ppc. I've tried to solve that and
sumbitted a patch to start deprecating these but I could not get that
merged. That thread ended here:
https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-ppc/2023-01/msg00406.html
Regards,
BALATON Zoltan