Re: [libvirt] [ruby-libvirt] Don't free more entries than we retrieved
On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 4:04 PM, Guido Günther <agx(a)sigxcpu.org> wrote:
The check for < 0 might be superfluos but freeing num entries
instead of
only r ones looks wrong to me since r is the number of allocated names,
not num. I'm happy to send a patch dropping the < 0 part.
Oh, bah humbug. Yeah, you are definitely right about that.
Please do send a patch with just the num -> r bit. That is definitely a bug.
Thanks,
Chris