On 03/22/2017 11:27 AM, Erik Skultety wrote:
Since mdevs are just another type of VFIO devices, we should
increase
the memory locking limit the same way we do for VFIO PCI devices.
Signed-off-by: Erik Skultety <eskultet(a)redhat.com>
---
src/qemu/qemu_domain.c | 9 +++++----
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/qemu/qemu_domain.c b/src/qemu/qemu_domain.c
index d1ac1d641b..04e64b47ea 100644
--- a/src/qemu/qemu_domain.c
+++ b/src/qemu/qemu_domain.c
@@ -6347,11 +6347,12 @@ qemuDomainRequiresMemLock(virDomainDefPtr def)
return true;
for (i = 0; i < def->nhostdevs; i++) {
- virDomainHostdevDefPtr dev = def->hostdevs[i];
+ virDomainHostdevSubsysPtr subsys = &def->hostdevs[i]->source.subsys;
- if (dev->mode == VIR_DOMAIN_HOSTDEV_MODE_SUBSYS &&
- dev->source.subsys.type == VIR_DOMAIN_HOSTDEV_SUBSYS_TYPE_PCI &&
- dev->source.subsys.u.pci.backend == VIR_DOMAIN_HOSTDEV_PCI_BACKEND_VFIO)
+ if (def->hostdevs[i]->mode == VIR_DOMAIN_HOSTDEV_MODE_SUBSYS &&
+ (subsys->type == VIR_DOMAIN_HOSTDEV_SUBSYS_TYPE_MDEV ||
+ (subsys->type == VIR_DOMAIN_HOSTDEV_SUBSYS_TYPE_PCI &&
+ subsys->u.pci.backend == VIR_DOMAIN_HOSTDEV_PCI_BACKEND_VFIO)))
return true;
}
ACK.