On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 13:34:25 +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
On 24.04.2015 12:03, Jiri Denemark wrote:
...
> - error:
> + cleanup:
> if (lockfd != -1) {
> unlink(lockpath);
> VIR_FORCE_CLOSE(lockfd);
> }
> VIR_FREE(lockpath);
> VIR_FREE(rundir);
> - VIR_FORCE_CLOSE(fd);
> - return -1;
> +
> + if (ret == -1)
s/== -1/< 0/ please. It is more future proof IMO. For instance, if we
invent new return value to describe more specifically what went wrong,
and we still want the socket to close.
Done, will push soon. Thanks,
Jirka