On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 02:04:31PM -0800, Dan Smith wrote:
DL> Right. For a container, <init> would be the only member
of <os>
DL> as well right? At the moment, I don't know of anything else that
DL> we will be adding to <container>.
No, <os> contains lots of stuff, just none of it applies to a
container :) From the perspective of a consumer of the interface,
there is only one block that needs to be examined. If you put <init>
in <container>, then I have to look at <container> (maybe) in addition
to <os> (maybe).
I always think of '<os>' as providing data about the way your start the
virtual machine. eg, the kernel / initrd for paravirt, the BIOS boot device
for fullvirt, and thus..... the 'init' process for containers.
Oh, pretend you didn't see the '<bootloader>' tag outside the <os>
block.
A historical mistake :-(
Dan.
--
|=- Red Hat, Engineering, Emerging Technologies, Boston. +1 978 392 2496 -=|
|=- Perl modules:
http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ -=|
|=- Projects:
http://freshmeat.net/~danielpb/ -=|
|=- GnuPG: 7D3B9505 F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 -=|