On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 08:11:14AM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
On 08/20/2012 07:49 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> From: "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange(a)redhat.com>
>
> To be able to test the QEMU monitor code, we need to have a fake
> QEMU monitor server. This introduces a simple (dumb) framework
> that can do this. The test case registers a series of items to
> be sent back as replies to commands that will be executed. A
> thread runs the event loop looking for incoming replies and
> sending back this pre-registered data. This allows testing all
> QEMU monitor code that deals with parsing responses and errors
> from QEMU, without needing QEMU around
Very sorely needed. Thanks for hacking this up, and hopefully it is
easily extensible.
> +++ b/cfg.mk
> @@ -741,7 +741,7 @@ exclude_file_name_regexp--sc_copyright_address = \
> exclude_file_name_regexp--sc_flags_usage = ^(docs/|src/util/virnetdevtap\.c$$)
>
> exclude_file_name_regexp--sc_libvirt_unmarked_diagnostics = \
> - ^src/rpc/gendispatch\.pl$$
> + ^(src/rpc/gendispatch\.pl$$|tests/)
A rather heavy hammer for just one added test, but makes sense (tests
aren't installed, so translating them is pointless).
That was an intentionally heavy hammer. We shouldn't waste translators
time on messages in the tests/ directory. In fact we should probably
write a syntax-check rule to *forbid* use of _(...) in tests/ directory
completely, rather than just whitelisted the existing rule.
Daniel
--
|:
http://berrange.com -o-
http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|:
http://libvirt.org -o-
http://virt-manager.org :|
|:
http://autobuild.org -o-
http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|:
http://entangle-photo.org -o-
http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|