On 12/10/19 10:08 AM, marcandre.lureau(a)redhat.com wrote:
From: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau(a)redhat.com>
Support by usage name can be considered separately (with a 'usage'
attribute?).
Cc: Stefan Berger <stefanb(a)linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau(a)redhat.com>
---
docs/formatsecret.html.in | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/docs/formatsecret.html.in b/docs/formatsecret.html.in
index 8d0630a7c3..8f5383cf64 100644
--- a/docs/formatsecret.html.in
+++ b/docs/formatsecret.html.in
@@ -334,8 +334,8 @@ Secret value set
of the vTPM.
The <code><usage type='vtpm'></code> element
must contain
a single <code>name</code> element that specifies a usage name
- for the secret. The vTPM secret can then be used by UUID or by
- this usage name via the <code><encryption></code>
element of
+ for the secret. The vTPM secret can then be used by UUID
+ via the <code><encryption></code> element of
a <a href="formatdomain.html#elementsTpm">tpm</a> when using
an
emulator.
<span class="since">Since 5.6.0</span>. The following is an
example
I've pushed this now
- Cole