On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 01:22:22 +0000, Ren, Qiaowei wrote:
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jiri Denemark [mailto:jdenemar@redhat.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2015 5:43 PM
> To: Ren, Qiaowei
> Cc: libvir-list(a)redhat.com
> Subject: Re: [libvirt] [PATCH 4/8] perf: implement the remote protocol for perf
> event
>
> On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 16:00:44 +0800, Qiaowei Ren wrote:
> > Add remote support for perf event.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Qiaowei Ren <qiaowei.ren(a)intel.com>
> > ---
> > daemon/remote.c | 60
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > src/remote/remote_driver.c | 49
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > src/remote/remote_protocol.x | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++-
> > src/remote_protocol-structs | 20 +++++++++++++++
> > 4 files changed, 160 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> This will need to be changed to match the new style of the API. But, since you
> are adding a new API, would you mind creating a patch for libvirt-python to add
> this new API to python bindings?
>
Sure. The patch for libvirt-python should be also sent this maillist with this series,
right?
Well, it's a different repository so sending it in the same series might
be a bit tricky. So it's up to you if you send it in one series or send
it as a separate patch. And yes, they should all be sent to this mailing
list.
Jirka