Re: [libvirt] [PATCHv7 5/9] blockjob: make drive-reopen safer
Il 16/09/2012 01:53, Eric Blake ha scritto:
This is only a problem for the RHEL 6.3 drive-reopen command; which
partly explains why upstream qemu 1.3 abandoned that command and
went with block-job-complete instead.
Not really true, in fact it's worse with block-job-complete because it's
asynchronous and can take longer. However, for QEMU 1.3 we'll provide a
persistent dirty bitmap that will let you catch this when restarting
libvirt.
Paolo