---
Building with ENABLE_DEBUG=0 showed more errors,
because VIR_DEBUG() get replaced with dummy 'do {} while(0)' statement,
and compiler complains about unused parameters. So if anybody knows
how to get rid of this ... Note that I am speaking about '...' part in
VIR_DEBUG_INT() definition.
src/util/command.c | 9 +++------
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/util/command.c b/src/util/command.c
index ebb90cb..4b8a940 100644
--- a/src/util/command.c
+++ b/src/util/command.c
@@ -962,9 +962,8 @@ virCommandProcessIO(virCommandPtr cmd)
} else {
inoff += done;
if (inoff == inlen) {
- int tmpfd = infd;
if (VIR_CLOSE(infd) < 0)
- VIR_DEBUG("ignoring failed close on fd %d",
tmpfd);
+ VIR_DEBUG("ignoring failed close on fd %d", infd);
}
}
}
@@ -1145,17 +1144,15 @@ virCommandRun(virCommandPtr cmd, int *exitstatus)
VIR_DEBUG("ignoring failed close on fd %d", tmpfd);
}
if (cmd->outbuf == &outbuf) {
- int tmpfd = cmd->outfd;
if (VIR_CLOSE(cmd->outfd) < 0)
- VIR_DEBUG("ignoring failed close on fd %d", tmpfd);
+ VIR_DEBUG("ignoring failed close on fd %d", cmd->outfd);
cmd->outfdptr = NULL;
cmd->outbuf = NULL;
VIR_FREE(outbuf);
}
if (cmd->errbuf == &errbuf) {
- int tmpfd = cmd->errfd;
if (VIR_CLOSE(cmd->errfd) < 0)
- VIR_DEBUG("ignoring failed close on fd %d", tmpfd);
+ VIR_DEBUG("ignoring failed close on fd %d", cmd->errfd);
cmd->errfdptr = NULL;
cmd->errbuf = NULL;
VIR_FREE(errbuf);
--
1.7.5.rc3