2011/4/11 Eric Blake <eblake(a)redhat.com>:
On 04/10/2011 05:28 AM, Matthias Bolte wrote:
> ---
> src/esx/esx_vi_types.c | 20 ++++++++++----------
> 1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/esx/esx_vi_types.c b/src/esx/esx_vi_types.c
> index 9e23030..29a3c39 100644
> --- a/src/esx/esx_vi_types.c
> +++ b/src/esx/esx_vi_types.c
> @@ -77,12 +77,12 @@
> int \
> esxVI_##__type##_Validate(esxVI_##__type *item) \
> { \
> - const char *type_name = esxVI_Type_ToString(esxVI_Type_##__type); \
> + const char *typeName = esxVI_Type_ToString(esxVI_Type_##__type); \
> \
> if (item->_type <= esxVI_Type_Undefined ||
\
> item->_type >= esxVI_Type_Other) {
\
> ESX_VI_ERROR(VIR_ERR_INTERNAL_ERROR, \
> - "%s object has invalid dynamic type", type_name);
\
> + _("%s object has invalid dynamic type"),
typeName); \
Hmm, cfg.mk already included ESX_VI_ERROR in the list of
msg_gen_function that should have caught this at 'make syntax-check'
time; I wonder why it was being overlooked. Oh, probably because
sc_libvirt_unmarked_diagnostics states that it won't find lines where
the format string is on a separate line. Same goes for
sc_unmarked_diagnostics from gnulib's maint.mk; wonder if there's a way
to improve the syntax checker.
At any rate, ACK.
Thanks, pushed.
Matthias