On 04/12/2013 03:40 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
On 04/12/2013 12:47 PM, Stefan Berger wrote:
> After a further simplification the patch now looks like this:
>
>
> Implement helper function to create the TPM's sysfs cancel file.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Berger <stefanb(a)linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Corey Bryant <coreyb(a)linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Tested-by: Corey Bryant <coreyb(a)linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>
> ---
> +char *
> +virTPMCreateCancelPath(const char *devpath)
> +{
> + char *path = NULL;
> + const char *dev;
> +
> + if (devpath) {
> + dev = strrchr(devpath, '/');
> + if (dev) {
> + dev++;
> + if (virAsprintf(&path,
"/sys/class/misc/%s/device/cancel",
> + dev) < 0) {
Do we need to worry about systems that don't mount sysfs at /sys? But
if there is someone in such a situation, they can provide a patch for
further configuration tuning.
Right...
> + virReportOOMError();
> + goto cleanup;
> + }
> + } else {
> + virReportError(VIR_ERR_INTERNAL_ERROR,
> + _("TPM device path %s is invalid"), devpath);
> + }
> + } else {
> + virReportError(VIR_ERR_INTERNAL_ERROR, "%s",
> + _("Missing TPM device path"));
> + }
> +
> +cleanup:
> + return path;
> +}
Looks okay to me.
Sounds like an ACK...