On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 05:33:21PM +0100, Pritesh Kothari wrote:
> I guess Dan did a more complete review of the code than mine.
One of the
> issues I had was many pieces of code licenced under the MIT Licence,
> which is compatible with the LGPL, but I must admit that if you are the
> authors of that code I would prefer just LGPL. I also saw parts which
> were MIT but allowed to relicence under LGPL, for the sake of uniformity
> I would prefer all files provided under LGPLv2 like the other parts of
> libvirt code. In a sense it's equivalent for you, but for people doing
> the legal review when trying to embbed libvirt this makes things more
> complicated. Any chance you could fix all those headers ?
I have fixed all headers to be LGPLv2.1 :)
Ah, that's good news :-)
Daniel
--
Daniel Veillard | libxml Gnome XML XSLT toolkit
http://xmlsoft.org/
daniel(a)veillard.com | Rpmfind RPM search engine
http://rpmfind.net/
http://veillard.com/ | virtualization library
http://libvirt.org/