Re: [libvirt] [PATCH v3] blockjob: use stable disk string in job event

On 06/19/14 00:41, Eric Blake wrote: > When the block job event was first added, it was for block pull, > where the active layer of the disk remains the same name. It was > also in a day where we only cared about local files, and so we > always had a canonical absolute file name. But two things have > changed since then: we now have network disks, where determining > a single absolute string does not really make sense; and we have > two-phase jobs (copy and active commit) where the name of the > active layer changes between the first event (ready, on the old > name) and second (complete, on the pivoted name). >

I almost didn't notice this one as I tend to skip cover letters and this looked just like one. ACK,