On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 06:42:10PM +0900, Masayuki Sunou wrote:
Hi
I understood as follows.
* There is no problem in a proposal 1 and a proposal 2
* It is better that the user can choose use of XML and use of command-option
by the situation
Therefore, I want to add both proposal 1 and proposal 2 to virsh.
There is no problem in this opinion?
And, I am going to correct about naming.
vif --> interface
vbd --> disk
That would be excellent !
Jet-lag and lack of sleep made me confuse the vif and vbd in the name with
actual arguments. Changing the names is fine, maybe we can get better
words: maybe add-netif/remove-netif instead of just using 'interface'
which is very generic, and maybe using add-block/remove-block instead of
disk, some devices may actually not be disk (e.g. tape drive), but it's
just a minor suggestion.
thanks a lot !
Daniel
--
Red Hat Virtualization group
http://redhat.com/virtualization/
Daniel Veillard | virtualization library
http://libvirt.org/
veillard(a)redhat.com | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit
http://xmlsoft.org/
http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine
http://rpmfind.net/