Re: [Libvir] [RFC] Device attach/detach on virsh

On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 12:21:00AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 12:50:40PM -0400, Daniel Veillard wrote: > > On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 06:50:53PM +0900, Masayuki Sunou wrote: > > To me this proposal is not okay as-is because it looks completely tied to > > Xen. But maybe I didn't understand, suppose I use KVM what would be the vbd > > or vif parameter looking like ? We need at least to change the terminology > > i.e. replace vif and vbd terms, but I'm afraid > > Huh ? I didn't see anything in this proposal which was Xen-specific. The Hum, sorry I misunderstood, I though it was using the vif and vbd internal Xen numbers to adress the device. I was focusing on the delete operation, and wondering what was the naming used. > disks where being identified based on their backend path (eg /var/lib/xen/image/foo.img > or /dev/sda4), while network cards were being identified based on their > MAC address. Both of those are unique identifiers used by pretty much > any virt system. yup objection removed, Daniel -- Red Hat Virtualization group http://redhat.com/virtualization/ Daniel Veillard | virtualization library http://libvirt.org/ veillard(a)redhat.com | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/ http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/