ping?
Beyond patch 1 which was reviewed. These are not uml specific, but
rather more how domain objects are handled
Tks -
John
On 04/02/2018 09:06 AM, John Ferlan wrote:
Patches 9-11 of larger series:
v1:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2018-March/msg00489.html
Changes since v1:
* Patches 1 and 2 new - essentially they fix issues with how
virDomainObjListRemove was used inconsistently.
* Patch 3 should be the same or very similar to the former patch 9:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2018-March/msg00498.html
* Patch 4 should be the same as former patch 10:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2018-March/msg00499.html
* Patch 5 is altered to also fix virDomainObjListRemove inconsistencies
John Ferlan (5):
uml: Fix umlProcessAutoDestroyDom dom processing
uml: Fix umlInotifyEvent dom object handling
uml: Create accessors to virDomainObjListFindByUUID
uml: Add more specific error message on failed FindBy call
uml: Use virDomainObjListFindBy{UUID|ID}Ref
src/uml/uml_driver.c | 353 +++++++++++++++++----------------------------------
1 file changed, 116 insertions(+), 237 deletions(-)