On 03/08/2010 05:29 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
On 03/05/2010 12:06 PM, Chris Lalancette wrote:
> The current code for "nodeinfo" is pretty naive
> about socket and thread information. To determine the
> sockets, it just takes the number of cpus and divides
> by the number of cores. For the thread count, it always
> sets it to 1. With more recent Intel machines, however,
> hyperthreading is again an option, meaning that these
> heuristics no longer work and give bogus numbers.
<snip>
> +
> +static int parse_socket(int cpu)
> +{
Several tools (such as ctag, or even more simply, 'git grep "^func"')
work better if all function implementations are listed with split lines,
such that the function name starts at the first column:
I've made the cleanups you suggested except for this one. I don't know
what the policy will be, but I'll leave it for now and we can do a more
global cleanup when we agree on something.
--
Chris Lalancette