On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 03:34:37PM +0200, Erik Skultety wrote:
See the RFC here:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2018-May/msg02218.html
Since RFC:
- split graphics 'gl' to a standalone structure since it's now SPICE, SDL,
*and* VNC that will support it
- egl-headless support for VNC, since VNC doesn't support OpenGL natively like
SPICE does
- added a new attribute 'native' for spice which will instruct libvirt to use
'-display egl-headless' instead of libvirt trying to figure this on out by
itself, since egl-headless might have other uses besides mdev with VNC
Can you elaborate on this part, as it feels a bit odd to me.
Currently -display accepts vnc or spice or sdl or gtk or none
Each of these -display options corresponds to a different <graphics type=XXX/>
element in libvirt XML, except 'none' which corresponds to no <graphics> at
all.
We already allow multiple <graphics> elements to turn on say both SPICE and
VNC at once.
So why would we want to treat egl-headless differently as an attribute under
the SPICE graphics, as opposed to just having <graphics type=egl-headless>
as a thing in its own right.
Regards,
Daniel
--
|:
https://berrange.com -o-
https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|:
https://libvirt.org -o-
https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|:
https://entangle-photo.org -o-
https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|