Re: [libvirt] [PATCH v3 06/18] blockjob: allow finer bandwidth tuning for query

On 08/31/14 06:02, Eric Blake wrote: > While reviewing the new virDomainBlockCopy API, Peter Krempa > pointed out that our existing design of using MiB/s for block > job bandwidth is rather coarse, especially since qemu tracks > it in bytes/s; so virDomainBlockCopy only accepts bytes/s. > But once the new API is implemented for qemu, we will be in > the situation where it is possible to set a value that cannot > be accurately reflected back to the user, because the existing > virDomainGetBlockJobInfo defaults to the coarser units. >

ACK. I presume virsh will be modified later in the series.