On Thu, Nov 21, 2024 at 14:02:22 +0000, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
On Thu, Nov 21, 2024 at 02:35:34PM +0100, Jiri Denemark wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 20, 2024 at 12:11:19 +0000, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 19, 2024 at 07:49:45PM +0100, Jiri Denemark wrote:
> > > We already visually group the included models according to vendor using
> > > comments. This patch introduces a new <group> element for doing it
> > > properly in a machine friendly way.
> >
> > AFAICT the <group> has no functional effect
>
> > If we're just going to group everything based on vendor,
> > why not just call the tag <vendor name=...> ?
>
> We can't use just vendor because some models (the old ones) don't have a
> vendor. We could perhaps use something like vendor='generic',
> vendor='QEMU' or something similar, although using the complete text
> from the comment makes reading a bit easier for people.
From QEMU's POV every model has a vendor.
Yeah, I was talking about our POV. Also the point of this patch was not
really to change grouping, just mark the groups in some way the script
can properly recognize them. I think the current groups are good enough.
Jirka