Eric Blake <eblake(a)redhat.com> wrote on 02/03/2011 02:31:13 PM:
On 02/03/2011 11:41 AM, Stefan Berger wrote:
>> Actually, you've uncovered a bigger bug, but didn't fix it right.
>
> ohoh, yes, there's a bug. This is how it should look like
>
> ---
> src/util/macvtap.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> Index: libvirt-acl/src/util/macvtap.c
> ===================================================================
> --- libvirt-acl.orig/src/util/macvtap.c
> +++ libvirt-acl/src/util/macvtap.c
> @@ -1048,8 +1048,8 @@ doPortProfileOpSetLink(bool nltarget_ker
>
> memcpy(ifla_vf_mac.mac, macaddr, 6);
>
> - if (!nla_put(nl_msg, IFLA_VF_MAC, sizeof(ifla_vf_mac),
> - &ifla_vf_mac) < 0)
> + if (nla_put(nl_msg, IFLA_VF_MAC, sizeof(ifla_vf_mac),
> + &ifla_vf_mac) < 0)
> goto buffer_too_small;
ACK.
Pushed.