"Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange(a)redhat.com> writes:
> Would you agree with something like this?
>
> <filesystem type='mount'>
> <device name="mtp share">mtp</device>
> ...
What is the name="mtp share" bit trying to reflect ?
It seems we're mostly biased towards <model> so I think we should aim
for <model type='mtp|9p'/>
it is the name of the MTP share within the guest. How will it look with
<model>?
Thanks,
Giuseppe