Re: [libvirt] [PATCH 0/2] Fix bridge creation/deletion on 2.6.x kernels

On 26.08.2015 17:53, Laine Stump wrote: > <snip/> > > How about this: give virNetlinkDelLink() a new argument > "fallbackDeleteFunc" which would either be NULL, or a pointer to > virNetDevBridgeDeleteWithIoctl() (in this case)? That avoids needing to > split virNetlinkDelLink into multiple parts as well as the duplication > of code, and I think it's much less obtuse than the boolean thing of V1. D'oh! I mean, if someone calls virNetlink*() he can assume that the function will talk to kernel via netlink. This would break the assumption. But I because I am unable to come up with a better idea, I think it's our best option.