Since we consider the failure of parsing the backing store to be
actually success based on the value we return to the caller, we should
continue parsing also features and the 'compat' field so that we don't
have a partial definition if e.g. the backing store format is not known.
Signed-off-by: Peter Krempa <pkrempa(a)redhat.com>
---
src/storage_file/storage_file_probe.c | 8 ++------
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/storage_file/storage_file_probe.c
b/src/storage_file/storage_file_probe.c
index c73f533d2d..4cf052c03d 100644
--- a/src/storage_file/storage_file_probe.c
+++ b/src/storage_file/storage_file_probe.c
@@ -955,13 +955,9 @@ virStorageFileProbeGetMetadata(virStorageSource *meta,
VIR_FREE(meta->backingStoreRaw);
if (fileTypeInfo[meta->format].getBackingStore != NULL) {
- int store =
fileTypeInfo[meta->format].getBackingStore(&meta->backingStoreRaw,
- &format,
- buf, len);
+ fileTypeInfo[meta->format].getBackingStore(&meta->backingStoreRaw,
+ &format, buf, len);
meta->backingStoreRawFormat = format;
-
- if (store == BACKING_STORE_INVALID)
- return 0;
}
g_clear_pointer(&meta->features, virBitmapFree);
--
2.42.0