Re: [libvirt] oVirt considers using macTableManager='libvirt'
On 11/01/2015 01:05 PM, Laine Stump wrote:
On 11/01/2015 08:52 AM, Ido Barkan wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> We, at oVirt, are considring using the automatic bridge management
> feature of libvirt for our hosts
> (macTableManager='libvirt').
> I could find any discussion in the mailing list archives about the
> motivation for this feature.
> (was there?). If there wasn't I would like to start a new one, about
> the possible trade offs it would
> have in oVirt.
> Specifically I have a few questions:
>
> 1) The obvious performance motivation is clear: considering N hosts
> with M vms each connected to
> the same LAN, the first packet to any unknown yet host will flood
> all the vms in all N bridges.
> -- was there any other motivation that I do not understand
> (apart from slightly better security?
It allows turning off both learning and flood, which improves performance, and also
causes
the physdev attached to the bridge to be automatically switched *out of * promiscuous
mode
(since the bridge always knows the list of MAC addresses that it should be listening
for,
it can just keep the physdev's mac filter table appropriately loaded, and have no
need for
promiscuous mode). Note that promisc mode can't be turned off if the bridge is
connected
to multiple physdevs (unless they are hooked together as a bond).
> 2) oVirt uses TC for port mirroring, in case this is requested by
> users, to mirror traffic from a chosen
> bridge to a chosen NIC in the host. I could not understand if
> macTableManager will interfere
> with it, or not.
As long as mirroring is only done in one direction (bridge to host NIC), there
shouldn't
be any interference. The bridge is is still programmed with the correct set of mac
addresses and should still be able to receive traffic destined for the VM.
I'm not sure, as I'm unfamiliar with this. I'm Cc's
Vlad from qemu/kernel networking to
see if he can give better information. (Vlad, please correct anything else I've
gotten
wrong in this response).
> 3) Are there any drawbacks to enabling this feature?
If a guest changes its MAC address, or expects to have traffic for multiple MAC
addresses
sent to it, you'll have problems. I don't remember right now if I also setup
libvirt to
respond to mac filter change events for tap devices connected to a bridge (as I have
done
for macvtap devices), but will look it up tomorrow and tell you.
> 4) We aim for rhel7.2. Will the feature be supported (or partially
> supported) for kernels older then
> 3.17? And if so, in what way?
I'm pretty sure that anything necessary to support it was backported to the kernel
used in
RHEL/CentOS7.2 (if it wasn't there already). Vlad will know for sure.
I think we initially turned this on in 7.2, so everything should be there.
> 5) oVirt currently builds its own bridges and tell libvirt about them.
> Does that have any affect on the
> functionality of that feature?
No. It works both for bridges created by libvirt and those created outside of libvirt.
> 6) are there any plans to support OVS for this feature in the future?
Yes, we have plans to support this for OVS.
-vlad
No concrete plans, but if someone wants to implement it, I'd be
happy to assist/review :-)