On 12/05/2012 10:00 AM, Laine Stump wrote:
> I wonder if the dnsmasq maintainer who so quickly updated 2.59
to
> > 2.63 will be willing to do another update to 2.64?
It's up to him of course, but my guess is there won't be any reluctance
to do that for Fedora 18 (although it will probably be an update after
the release). For F17, that all depends on the temperament of the
maintainer. Some packages (e.g. libvirt) are *never* rebased after the
beta freeze, and some are a bit more relaxed.
I just saw the git push emails - Tomas has pushed dnsmasq-2.64 to F17,
F18, and rawhide. No updates pushed to updates-testing yet though.