Re: [PATCH v2 02/36] cpu_x86: Promote added/removed from ancestor
On Fri, Nov 22, 2024 at 10:32:42PM +0100, Jiri Denemark wrote:
When a CPU model is defined based on another model, we were
completely
ignoring features marked as added to or removed from the original model
after it was released. For added features this is the right thing to do
as it will promote them to become normal features included in the new
model. But features marked as removed would become included in the new
model as well. We need to explicitly remove them as if they were never
included in the model.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar(a)redhat.com>
---
Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange(a)redhat.com>
With regards,
Daniel
--
|: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|