On 12/07/2012 06:27 AM, Peter Krempa wrote:
On 12/07/12 14:19, Gao Yongwei wrote:
>
>
> 2012/12/7 Peter Krempa <pkrempa(a)redhat.com <mailto:pkrempa@redhat.com>>
>
[...]
>
> I think, if a vm is marked has autodestroyed,then this means that we do
> not need this vm again on next reboot.? if so,what's the reason for us
> to save this vm?
> if we want to save it,why we marked it has autodestroyed? ^ ^
Well, autodestroy means that the guest is destroyed when the current
libvirt connection (the connection that started the guest) is
terminated. I don't see any reason why the user shouldn't be allowed to
save the guest if he explicitly wishes to do so.
The decision to forbid saving autodestroy guests was an intentional
design decision. If you don't want the guest to survive a libvirtd
restart, then you should not need to save the guest for any other
reason, either. NACK to this patch.
--
Eric Blake eblake redhat com +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library
http://libvirt.org