On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 18:52:51 -0500, John Ferlan wrote:
On 01/18/2017 01:47 PM, Peter Krempa wrote:
> The file became a garbage dump for all kinds of utility functions over
> time. Move them to a separate file so that the files can become a clean
> interface for the storage backends.
> ---
> po/POTFILES.in | 1 +
> src/Makefile.am | 3 +-
> src/storage/storage_backend.c | 2954 +-------------------------------
> src/storage/storage_backend.h | 125 --
> src/storage/storage_backend_disk.c | 1 +
> src/storage/storage_backend_fs.c | 1 +
> src/storage/storage_backend_gluster.c | 1 +
> src/storage/storage_backend_iscsi.c | 1 +
> src/storage/storage_backend_logical.c | 1 +
> src/storage/storage_backend_mpath.c | 1 +
> src/storage/storage_backend_rbd.c | 1 +
> src/storage/storage_backend_scsi.c | 1 +
> src/storage/storage_backend_sheepdog.c | 1 +
> src/storage/storage_backend_zfs.c | 1 +
> src/storage/storage_driver.c | 1 +
> src/storage/storage_util.c | 2919 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> src/storage/storage_util.h | 149 ++
> tests/storagevolxml2argvtest.c | 2 +-
> 18 files changed, 3117 insertions(+), 3047 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 src/storage/storage_util.c
> create mode 100644 src/storage/storage_util.h
>
Rather than adding #include "storage_util.h", why not add it to
src/storage/storage_backend.h since that's included by all that need it.
IDC either way.
That include is going to be dropped soon in the patch that I did not
send yet. storage_backend.h will become the interface where storage
backends are registered/loaded. The point of this patch was to actually
allow this by moving the utility code one layer dow, so that this file
becomes clean.
While looking at what includes storage_backend.h I note that
*_mpath.{ch} both include storage_backend.h, but *_mpath.c doesn't
include *_mpath.h. It's the only one...
That one will be fixed as well by the upcoming patch, since it will add
public API of all the storage drivers to register themselves.
ACK -
Thanks.