Re: [Libvir] Flags for CPU / system 'features'
On Mon, Aug 14, 2006 at 03:14:57PM -0400, Jeremy Katz wrote:
On Mon, 2006-08-14 at 15:03 +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> Thus I propose a top level '<features>' block within the
'<domain>' XML doc.
> This block would contain tags named after each feature to be enabled. Presence
> of the named tag enables the feature, ommision disables it (thus all features
> are disabled by default - matching current behaviour).
Sounds good to me. As well as useful to have :)
> My only thought, is 'features' a good name for this ? Only other name I
> came up with was 'capabilities' but this is harder to spell :-)
I think feature is actually pretty reasonable
Ok, I've committed the patch along with updates to the HTML docs on the
XML format. BTW, I think it would be useful to have a formal schema defined
for the XML format - not for sake of validation - just to unambiguously
define what we're expecting in the XML from apps. The current format.html
doc is a good overview, but its not exactly precise in detailing what we
expect / support.
Regards,
Dan.
--
|=- Red Hat, Engineering, Emerging Technologies, Boston. +1 978 392 2496 -=|
|=- Perl modules: http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ -=|
|=- Projects: http://freshmeat.net/~danielpb/ -=|
|=- GnuPG: 7D3B9505 F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 -=|