On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 10:03:55 -0400, John Ferlan wrote:
On 09/28/2017 09:47 AM, Peter Krempa wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 15:07:35 -0400, John Ferlan wrote:
>>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1475250
>>
>> It's possible to define and start a pool with a '.' in the
>> name; however, when trying to add a volume to a domain using
>> the storage pool source with a name with a '.' in the name,
>> the domain RNG validation fails because RNG uses 'genericName'
>> which does not allow a '.' in the name. Pool definition has
>> no similar call to virXMLValidateAgainstSchema. Pool name
>> validation occurs in storagePoolDefineXML and only calls
>> virXMLCheckIllegalChars using the same parameter "\n" as
>> qemuDomainDefineXMLFlags would check after the RNG check
>> could be succesful.
>>
>> So in order to resolve this, create a poolName definition
>> in the RNG and allow the pool name and the volume source
>> pool name to use that definition.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: John Ferlan <jferlan(a)redhat.com>
>> ---
>> docs/schemas/domaincommon.rng | 2 +-
>> docs/schemas/storagecommon.rng | 8 ++++++++
>> docs/schemas/storagepool.rng | 4 ++--
>> 3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/docs/schemas/domaincommon.rng b/docs/schemas/domaincommon.rng
>> index 76852abb3..2cc8dcecf 100644
>> --- a/docs/schemas/domaincommon.rng
>> +++ b/docs/schemas/domaincommon.rng
>> @@ -1669,7 +1669,7 @@
>> <optional>
>> <element name="source">
>> <attribute name="pool">
>> - <ref name="genericName"/>
>> + <ref name="poolName"/>
>> </attribute>
>> <attribute name="volume">
>> <ref name="volName"/>
>> diff --git a/docs/schemas/storagecommon.rng b/docs/schemas/storagecommon.rng
>> index 717f3c603..49578312e 100644
>> --- a/docs/schemas/storagecommon.rng
>> +++ b/docs/schemas/storagecommon.rng
>> @@ -6,6 +6,14 @@
>> <!-- This schema is not designed for standalone use; another file
>> must include both this file and basictypes.rng -->
>>
>> + <define name="poolName">
>> + <data type="string">
>> + <!-- Use literal newline instead of \n for bug in libxml2 2.7.6
-->
>> + <param name="pattern">[^
>> +]+</param>
>> + </data>
>> + </define>
>> +
>> <define name='encryption'>
>> <element name='encryption'>
>> <attribute name='format'>
>> diff --git a/docs/schemas/storagepool.rng b/docs/schemas/storagepool.rng
>> index f0117bd69..52b2044be 100644
>> --- a/docs/schemas/storagepool.rng
>> +++ b/docs/schemas/storagepool.rng
>> @@ -209,7 +209,7 @@
>> <interleave>
>> <optional>
>> <element name='name'>
>> - <ref name='genericName'/>
>> + <ref name='poolName'/>
>
> This means that a name starting with a dot is invalid according to the
> schema, but the user ignored the schema and the code is not doing enough
> validation.
>
> I'm not convinced that this is the correct solution. VMs disallow dots
> since the name is used for generating filenames and using '../' as
> prefix will allow directory traversal exploits.
>
> NACK, I think we should disallow pool names with a dot even in the code.
> It will be slightly harder since there are no 'validate' callbacks for
> them and you can't disallow them in the parser.
>
As a test I defined a domain and a pool using ".test" and it worked.
# virsh list
Id Name State
----------------------------------------------------
1 .f23 running
# virsh dumpxml .f23
<domain type='kvm' id='1'>
<name>.f23</name>
<uuid>e28761fe-ea53-4682-924a-744a4028f146</uuid>
<memory unit='KiB'>2097152</memory>
...
The problem with disallowing in code after the fact is how do you handle
things now that we have allowed it? I have another long standing bug
where someone doesn't want a space in the name or even worse a space as
the name.
Fair enough, in fact qemu driver (and others which rely on files) forbid
usage of '/' in the name. In such case we can allow a '.' or whatever
else, so that it's not considered as a directory.
In case of the storage driver I think we can ban '/' accross all drivers
and also in the parser, since storage pool containing an '/' probably
would vanish after VM restart and/or fail to be created for other
reasons than validation.
Anyways, you need to change the validation regex and add the check to
reject slashes.