On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 04:04:01PM -0600, Jim Fehlig wrote:
On 04/17/2018 02:20 PM, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 02:00:25PM -0600, Jim Fehlig wrote:
> > Your response in the V6 thread about "conflicting types (with
> > libxl_get_free_memory_0x040700)" was a good hint. Things work fine for me
on
> > Xen 4.4 through 4.10 with the following squashed in
> >
> > diff --git a/tests/Makefile.am b/tests/Makefile.am
> > index 2c0d1311c..8c4b6c220 100644
> > --- a/tests/Makefile.am
> > +++ b/tests/Makefile.am
> > @@ -528,6 +528,7 @@ libxlxml2domconfigtest_LDADD = $(libxl_LDADDS)
$(LIBXML_LIBS)
> >
> > virmocklibxl_la_SOURCES = \
> > virmocklibxl.c
> > +virmocklibxl_la_CFLAGS = $(LIBXL_CFLAGS)
> > virmocklibxl_la_LDFLAGS = $(MOCKLIBS_LDFLAGS)
> > virmocklibxl_la_LIBADD = $(MOCKLIBS_LIBS)
> >
> > But I'm still confused as to how this works for you. Any idea about that?
:-)
>
> Oh, I see it now. For me, -DLIBXL_API_VERSION=0x040400 landed in CFLAGS,
> not only LIBXL_CFLAGS. According to config.log it happened just after
> testing for xenlight - first, the test using pkg-config failed (something
> wrong with my libxl installation), but then fallback to manual check.
> And since then, every gcc call have -DLIBXL_API_VERSION=0x040400.
>
> Looking at m4/virt-driver-libxl.m4, I think it's because saved
> old_CFLAGS is overridden by LIBVIRT_CHECK_LIB with actual CFLAGS (now
> containing -DLIBXL_API_VERSION=0x040400).
Ah, looks to be the case. But that is existing and can be fixed in a
followup IMO. So do you agree with the change to add LIBXL_CFLAGS to
virmocklibxl_la_CFLAGS?
Yes, of course. Should I submit yet another version?
--
Best Regards,
Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
Invisible Things Lab
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?